Unified Inference for Nonlinear Factor Models from Panels with Fixed and Large Time Span
Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming
(with Torben G. Andersen, Viktor Todorov, and Rasmus Varneskov)

We propose a unified estimator for the parameter vector and the latent state variables of a non linear factor model governing the dynamics of panel observations. Relying on fill-in asymptotic the estimator can simultaneously accomodate the case in which the time span is fixed or large.
Stacks Image 3104


We provide unifying inference theory for parametric nonlinear factor models based on a panel of noisy observations. The panel has a large cross-section and a time span that may be either small or large. Moreover, we incorporate an additional source of information, provided by noisy observations on some known functions of the factor realizations. The estimation is carried out via penalized least squares, i.e., by minimizing the L2 distance between observations from the panel and their model-implied counterparts, augmented by a penalty for the deviation of the extracted factors from the noisy signals of them. When the time dimension is fixed, the limit distribution of the parameter vector is mixed Gaussian with conditional variance depending on the path of the factor realizations. On the other hand, when the time span is large, the convergence rate is faster and the limit distribution is Gaussian with a constant variance. In this case, however, we incur an incidental parameter problem since, at each point in time, we need to recover the concurrent factor realizations. This leads to an asymptotic bias that is absent in the setting with a fixed time span. In either scenario, the limit distribution of the estimates for the factor realizations is mixed Gaussian, but is related to the limiting distribution of the parameter vector only in the scenario with a fixed time horizon. Although the limit behavior is very different for the small versus large time span, we develop a feasible inference theory that applies, without modification, in either case. Hence, the user need not take a stand on the relative size of the time dimension of the panel. Similarly, we propose a time-varying data-driven weighting of the penalty in the objective function, which enhances efficiency by adapting to the relative quality of the signal for the factor realizations.

Short-Term Market Risk Implied by Weekly Options
Journal of Finance, 72(3) 2017
(with Torben G. Andersen and Viktor Todorov)

Using options with very short maturity we study the dynamics of the variance and jump risks. We find that
the shape of the left tail of the risk-neutral distribution (1) shows persistent changes over time which are not always connected to the dynamics of volatility and (2) that it has predictive power for future short-term market returns.
Stacks Image 3113


We study short-term market risks implied by weekly S&P 500 index options. The introduction of weekly options has dramatically shifted the maturity profile of traded options over the last five years, with a substantial proportion now having expiry within one week. Such short-dated options provide a direct way to study volatility and jump risks. Unlike longer-dated options, they are largely insensitive to the risk of intertemporal shifts in the economic environment. Adopting a novel semi-nonparametric approach, we uncover variation in the negative jump tail risk which is not spanned by market volatility and helps predict future equity returns. Incidents of tail shape shifts coincide with mispricing of standard parametric models for longer-dated options. As such, our approach allows for easy identification of periods of heightened concerns about negative tail events that are not always “signaled” by the level of market volatility and elude standard asset pricing models.

The Risk Premia Embedded in Index Options (AQR Honorable Mention, 2014)
Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3) 2015
(with Torben G. Andersen and Viktor Todorov)

The dynamics of the out-of-the-money Put options is not only driven by volatility but also by a factor that is independent from it. This factor has predictive power for future risk premia (i.e. equity and variance risk premia) but not for future risks (i.e. future volatility and future jumps).
Stacks Image 1168


We study the dynamic relation between market risks and risk premia using time series of index option surfaces. We find that priced left tail risk cannot be spanned by market volatility (and its components) and introduce a new tail factor. This tail factor has no incremental predictive power for future volatility and jump risks, beyond current and past volatility, but is critical in predicting future market equity and variance risk premia. Our findings suggest a wide wedge between the dynamics of market risks and their compensation, with the latter typically displaying a far more persistent reaction following market crises.

Parametric Inference and Dynamic State Recovery from Option Panels
Econometrica, May 2015
(with Torben G. Andersen and Viktor Todorov)

We develop a new estimation procedure to estimate option pricing models that relies on the assumption that the number of options on a given day goes to infinity. We also provide three different tests to assess the empirical performance of a given option pricing model.
Stacks Image 1190


We develop a new parametric estimation procedure for option panels observed with error which relies on asymptotic approximations assuming an ever increasing set of observed option prices in the moneyness-maturity (cross-sectional) dimension, but with a fixed time span. We develop consistent estimators of the parameter vector and the dynamic realization of the state vector that governs the option price dynamics. The estimators converge stably to a mixed-Gaussian law and we develop feasible estimators for the limiting variance. We provide semiparametric tests for the option price dynamics based on the distance between the spot volatility extracted from the options and the one obtained nonparametrically from high-frequency data on the underlying asset. We further construct new formal tests of the model fit for specific regions of the volatility surface and for the stability of the risk-neutral dynamics over a given period of time.

Realizing Smiles: Option Pricing with Realized Volatility
Journal of Financial Economics, 107(2), 2013
(with Fulvio Corsi and Davide La Vecchia)

We develop a model in which the Realized Volatility can be used as an input to price option. The advantage, with respect to traditional GARCH models, is that the model is more reactive to changes in volatility and thus produces more accurate pricing for at-the-money short maturity options. Also, the persistence built in our model allows to better capture the term structure of the implied volatility surface.
Stacks Image 1203


We develop a discrete-time stochastic volatility option pricing model, which exploits the information contained in high frequency data. The Realized Volatility (RV) is used as a proxy of the unobservable log-returns volatility. We model its dynamics by a simple but effective long-memory process: The Leverage Heterogeneous Auto-Regressive Gamma (HARGL) process. The discrete-time specification and the use of the RV allow to easily estimate the model using observed historical data. Assuming a standard exponentially affine stochastic discount factor, we obtain a fully analytic change of measure. An extensive empirical analysis of S&P 500 index options illustrates that our approach significantly outperforms competing time-varying (i.e. GARCH-type) and stochastic volatility pricing models. The pricing improvement can be ascribed to: (i) The direct use of the RV, which provides a precise and fast adapting measure of the unobserved underlying volatility; (ii) The specification of our model, which is able to accurately reproduce the implied volatility term structure.

Valuing Modularity as a Real Option
Management Science, 55(11), November 2009
(with Andrea Gamba)

Within the real option framework we provide a quantitative approach to evaluate modular projects.
Stacks Image 1216


We provide a general valuation approach for capital budgeting decisions involving the modularization in the design of a system. Within the framework developed by Baldwin and Clark (2000), we implement a valuation approach using a numerical procedure based on the Least Squares Monte Carlo method proposed by Longstaff and Schwartz (2001). The approach is accurate, general and flexible.

Barrier Option Pricing with Adjusted Transition Probabilities
Journal of Derivatives, 16(2), Winter 2008
(with Giovanni Barone-Adesi and John Theal)

Correcting the transition probabilities of a standard binomial (trinomial) model to take into account for the probability of crossing a barrier between the tree steps, we improve the pricing of barrier options for many different type of barrier shapes.
Stacks Image 381


In the existing literature on barrier options much effort has been exerted to ensure convergence through placing the barrier in close proximity to, or directly onto, the nodes of the tree lattice. For a variety of barrier option types we show that such a procedure may not be a necessary prerequisite to achieving accurate option price approximations. Using the Kamrad and Ritchken (1991) trinomial tree model we show that with a suitable transition probability adjustment our “probability adjusted” model exhibits convergence to the barrier option price. We study the convergence properties of several option types including exponential barrier options, single linear time-varying barrier options, double linear time- varying barriers options and Bermuda options. For options whose strike price is close to the barrier we are able to obtain numerical results where other models and techniques typically fail. Furthermore, we show that it is possible to calculate accurate option price approximations with minimal effort for options with complicated barriers that defeat standard techniques. In no single case does our method require a repositioning of the pricing lattice nodes.